
This is the last holiday gift post, I promise (*hiding fingers behind back*). The fine folks over at
Radar Magazine have a VERY funny
article on the top 10 (ok, 11) most dangerous toys. It covers the usual suspect from Lawn Darts (Jarts, as they were branded) to cute little death hammocks to a Cabbage Patch doll designed to eat children's fingers. My personal favorite is the Gilbert U-238 Atomic Energy Lab...almost as much fun as letting a pool of mercury bead about in the palm of your hand (come on, you know you did it too).
On a minor side-rant, I object to the banning of many of these toys. Granted, giving kids a "
toy" that melts (toxic) plastic at high temperature might be considered...er...dangerous...but my complaint is really just with the toxic nature of the plastic, not the molten aspects. I think our over-protective nature (and over-litigious nature) runs the risk of breeding generations of small humans who genuinely can not identify/protect themselves from risk.
The analogy is what is happening with the "success" of childhood immunizations. Our success in suppressing childhood diseases is having an unintended consequence of effectively creating generations of young adults whose immune systems are *more* susceptible to later viral/bacteriological attacks because their immune systems were never tested/challenged in childhood...that is, never grew robust.
Perhaps the problem is that we have grown accustomed to buying schlock for our kids and expecting them to go off, play with it and leave us alone. Have you *tried* to find a good chemistry set for kids recently...it has become *really* hard to find one that is *remotely* interesting/challenging (that is, can make things that explode/flame/burn). I loved my chemistry set (and my electronics set, with which I could have pretty easily electrocuted myself). What I *really* loved was the time I spent with my father playing with them...because I was only allowed to use the sets *with* him.
Lawn darts were/are *really* fun as is, I am sure, a cannon that shoots eyeball sized cannon balls 35 feet, as are (I guess) "power wheels" (though, admittedly, throttles that stick open are a bit of an issue). It is sort of a shame that dangerous toys can't be seen from a sort of "applied Darwinian theory" approach...if you can't live through a childhood of dangerous toys, its simply Nature culling you from the herd.
The interesting thing to me is that my most dangerous moments in childhood were with VERY safe toys that I managed to make REALLY dangerous. For example, I went behind the barn (so mom wouldn't see me, and set up a big battlefield in the gravel drive out the back of the barn, complete with trenches and little trees, etc....all the while burying BlackCat firecrackers all over the battlefield with their little wicks over the trenches (*foreshadow*). When everything was *JUST RIGHT* I poured gasoline down all the trenches and then a stream back about 5-10 feet or so...then I lit it off. Flames, explosions, bits of rock and molten plastic flying all over...it was EXCELLENT.
I also remember making a large (3 feetish) plastic model of the the battleship Iowa, drilling a hole in the deck, pouring in some gasoline, plugging the hole with a firecracker with a *long* wick and pushing it out into the lake. The explosion was GREAT but the coolest part was the strange molten plastic abstract art piece that was all that was left of the mighty Iowa.
Then there were "Kite Wars"...where my best friend and I would take perfectly save delta wing bat kites, superglue split double edged razor blades along the leading edges of the kites wings and fight with them (you'd get less points cutting the string than you did for shredding the opponent's kite).
Oh, and then there was the "Lie Detector" that a friend and I made. It had a bunch of printed circuit boards that didn't do anything, a red LED, two copper pads and a scissor switch (the first time it is pushed, it does not make a connection, the second time it does)...and a 700 watt very low amp li-ion battery. My friend and I took it to school. We would "demonstrate" it on eachother, licking our fingers first, "to make a good connection" and then answer a question. Nothing would happen, because we answered truthfully. Then we would let our friends try. They would lick their fingers, hold the copper pads and, with the push of a button, take a shock that pretty much numbed your arms up to your elbows. I am, with the advantage of age, very pleased none of our friends had heart conditions. This was great fun all day...many people came back for more...wildly dumb. These days, we would probably be arrested. Hell, we probably should have been then. To be fair...we were quite confident it would not hurt anyone...we had tried it out on ourselves and his younger brother before bringing it to school.
Admittedly, I did a fair amount of incredibly stupid things...but I generally did them carefully and have all my fingers and toes and eyes (and only a handful of scars). The trick, I suggest, is not necessarily to *protect* kids from any and all risky toys...but to teach them trouble shooting and problem solving skills so that when they embark on some ridiculously dangerous pursuit, they manage to live through it. I worry that in protecting them from the consequences of dangerous toys, we are crippling their ability to understand and cope with "dangerous decision making". This all said, a doll that mechanically "eats" and can not be stopped when...er...a finger is being chewed...is just plain stupid.
Labels: bookish, random bits