A great voice of reason (and sarcasm) is silenced...
Molly Ivins is dead. I am going to sulk for a day or two....and uproot a shrub in her memory.
Labels: history, random bits
An evolving experiment in blogging about rare books, fine books and fun books, book collecting, book buying and bibliomania...and random musings on [mostly] related subjects...
Molly Ivins is dead. I am going to sulk for a day or two....and uproot a shrub in her memory.
Labels: history, random bits
TimeOnline has a rather lengthy article on the practice of shill bidding on ebay. Shill bidding is when a seller (and/or the seller's buddies) bids on their own merchandise. It is happening, apparently, increasingly often...and is made harder to detect by ebay's recent move to "conceal" the identity of bidders when the bids go above a certain point. The punchline, of course, is that ebay has absolutely no impetus to actually stop this practice as they profit from it. For every potential buyer (like me) that either reduces or stops using the site, there are plenty of others who either do not know or do not care...
Labels: bookish, computers, random bits
Thomas', Great Books and Book Collectors offers up another gem. Most are aware that "points" that distinguish a first state from a second (or third) often revolve around a caught misspelling or other typographical error. Seldom, however, is it the result of the author's change of heart regarding a substantiative bit of text.
Sunday, 10 October 1779. I mentioned to him a dispute between a friend of mine and his lady, concerning conjugal infidelity, which my friend had maintained was by no means so bad in her husband, as in the wife. JOHNSON. 'Your friend was in the right, Sir. . . . Wise married women don't trouble themselves about infidelity in their husbands, they detest a mistress, but don't mind a whore. My wife told me I might lye with as many women as I pleased, provided I loved her alone'Boswell had second thoughts about the prudence of the passaged while it was on on-press and called for it to be struck. Perhaps his wife read the manuscript and offered a more compelling authority...
Labels: bookish, censorship, history, random bits
So you want to reproduce an incunabula bible and you find yourself wondering, "Just how many sheep will I need to secure to supply me with the vellum needed?" (This is the sort of query that keeps the PETA people up at night.) The short answer is, 210 to 225 sheep. I ran across this tidbit in Alan Thomas' wonderful, Great Books and Book Collectors, but found this for those of you insist on immediate gratification.
Labels: bookish, history, random bits
Labels: bookish, books, random bits
Just a quick update on the business front, partially snipped from our recent newsletter (email if you would like to be on the mailing list). Of particular note, we recently acquired a very unusual Stephen King item, one of five unedited manuscripts of the book, IT, along with a some significant, related correspondence.
I have just completed cataloguing an exceptional collection of woodcut material including significant material from Rockwell Kent, Lynd Ward and Frans Masereel. This collection adds nicely to the collection of illustrated juvenilia we acquired several months ago. The catalogue of all this illustrated material is complete, email if you would like a copy.
Also, and for your near-term book browsing pleasure, we will be found at Books at the 25th Street Armory book fair on January 26 and 27th. It is a great location and should be a fun show. We will be bringing a collection of material focused on the illustrated page but will, as always, be bringing a broad selection of material...something to tickle nearly any fancy. Please let us know if there is anything you would specifically like us to bring and we shall do so.
Labels: bookish, books, random bits
It is Jan. 19th, Edgar Allan Poe's birthday. As many will know, Poe died in 1849 and starting in 1949, on this day, an unknown gentleman has left a half filled bottle of cognac and three roses at his grave. There have been few variations, though one occurred in 1993 when he also left a note stating "The torch will be passed." A later note indicated that the original Toaster passed-away in 1998 and the duty has fallen to a son. More here.
A jargon watch pundits (brief or long) have pointed out that "book" is the new "cool". Now many of us already knew this to be true...but it is now breaking into the "normal" world. Well, maybe not normal, it is breaking into the T9 world. T9, for those who do not know, stands for "Text on 9 Keys"...that is, typing alpha on the numeric keyboard of a cell phone.
Labels: bookish, computers, random bits
NYT has a great story about the renovation a Boston book dealer's renovation project...a multi-story home built around a virtual (and literal) tower of books. Of course, my first thought was that there is a great deal more surface area around in the inside exterior wall...like a very small Dyson's Sphere...an around a column up the center.
Labels: bookish, random bits
Labels: bookish, random bits
For those with little else to do, WordCat has a "Watch WorldCat Grow" page, refreshed every 8 seconds, where you can sit and watch, in slightly delayed real time, WorldCat grow. As if that was not cool enough, it also displays the most recent title added. The excitement is almost palpable.
Labels: books, computers, random bits
For those with little else to do, WordCat has a "Watch WorldCat Grow" page, refreshed every 8 seconds, where you can sit and watch, in slightly delayed real time, WorldCat grow. As if that was not cool enough, it also displays the most recent title added. The excitement is almost palpable.
Labels: bookish, computers, random bits
In brief:
CIA and British Intelligence agents forced a passenger plane to land in Malta in 1957, to go on board and steal the manuscript of the banned Russian novel ‘Dr Zhivago’, which was subsequently published and awarded a Nobel Prize.Great story....will have to read the proverbial book.
Richard Minsky has written the proverbial book about American Decorated Publishers' Bindings 1872-1929. It appears, at first blush to be an exceptional work and I look forward to getting a copy...all the more because he purchased at least one volume from me that is included in the catalogue raisonne. What would be better than owning a copy of this book, you ask?
Labels: books, random bits
Forrest, the ghost behind Joslin Hall Rare Books (and crafter of, I suggest, the best catalogue entries currently being printed) offered up this wonderful piece today. The story is from the August, 2006 issue of Maine Antiques Digest (and I am embarrassed to admit that I missed it when published). In (very) brief: the US government is somewhat aggressively pursuing WPA program art pieces. Their position is that these art pieces (focused on painting and prints here, but probably extends to photographs, etc.) where paid for by the Feds and they own them, as put here:
“…There is much that needs to be made public about this…There are at least 10,000 WPA easel paintings missing. And the WPA artists and their work were treated shabbily by any standards when the project came to a close. Many works were unceremoniously dumped or otherwise mistreated, and some may have found their way back to the artists.”According to the article, the distinguishing artifact appears to be a wee label reading something like, "Federal Works Progress Administration, Pennsylvania". In the case discussed, one labeled painting was seized while another, by a WPA artist and of the "right" period...but lacking the label...was not. Expect to find similar labels in various gallery waste bins.
“In late 1943, a Long Island junk dealer paid a government warehouse in Flushing, Queens [New York], four cents a pound for bales of canvas that he planned on reselling as insulation for hot water pipes—until he noticed that the canvas was painted on. It turned out that the bales contained a ton of paintings from the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and the Federal Arts Project, two New Deal programs that had employed artists as part of the Roosevelt administration’s much broader effort to cut the 25% unemployment rate of the Great Depression. The now-defunct programs had required artists to turn in one piece a month as a condition of employment, but with World War II going on, the paintings, minus their frames, were declared surplus property.It is an interesting and complex issues. One one hand, if the government made a very bad sale (say, several tens of millions of dollars worth of art for, you know, a liquidation price of $50/ton), then they should just have to suck it up and deal. Frankly, from a legal standpoint, they had the "stronger" negotiating position in the sale and errors should be "read against them." That said, they are the government and have the annoying ability to change the rules as they see fit. There has been some litigation...but none that seems determinative. This will, I wager, change. Certainly worth keeping an eye on this one as well...
Labels: bookish, history, random bits
So here is the story in brief: a woman leaving a public library in Anderson County, SC sets off the alarm. The security guard chases the woman who is now running to her car. He *claims* the car's bumper brushed his leg as she pulled out. Regardless, he fired his handgun into her door.
Labels: bookish, random bits

Labels: computers, music, random bits, rantishness
BusinessWeek has just run a great article very close to my heart (thank you for the half dozen or so friends/clients who forwarded me copies). "Beyond the Bookself" is about the growth of private/personal libraries. The article is focused heavily on the nature/design of the rooms themselves and they quote Scott Brown (Fine Books) and Susan Benne (ABAA), but the overarching message is my mantra: A private library is the most significant thing most of us will ever build. Admittedly, most of what I do is library/collection development...so I am biased. Do not miss the link to the related pictures (or just click).
Labels: bookish
The fine folks at Fine Books called my attention to a rather amazing bit of video. Apparently, at an auction of Irish historical material at Adam's, protesters disrupted the proceedings claiming that the material belonged in institutions. While the private/public ownership of documents of historical merit is an interesting (and long running) issue, I must admit my first reaction was just being pleased to see young people "engaged" enough to A) be thinking about the "loss" of cultural history and B) knowing what/where the auction house was (ok, just a little sarcastic). Well worth a watch.
Labels: bookish, random bits
President Bush claimed new powers today to search US mail without a warrant. In a "signing statement" he executed while signing the postal overhaul bill on December 20, he basically undermined a substantial aspect of the bill itself. His signing statement directly contradicts the part of the bill that explicitly reinforces protections of first-class mail from searches without a court's approval. My grandmother *often* told me that if I didn't have anything productive to say, perhaps I shouldn't say anything at all...while I often ignore these sage words, what could I really say about this that would not result in a long rant.
Labels: censorship, rantishness
I have been rereading the Lovecraft canon and just absorbed Call of Cthulhu. I realized two things: first off, it has one of the truly great opening sentences and/or first full paragraphs; secondly, for better or worse, I realized I know it from memory:
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a dark new age.I'm thinking of doing a broadside of this with a local letterpress artist, with a nice graphic of some sort. We shall see. Feel free to post your favorite below.
According to this Wired article, one byproduct of Chicago State University's nearly $40MM library reno is that students will no longer be allowed in the stacks. All shelving and pulling of books will be done by robotic "pickers". This is a technology that has been evolving rapidly in warehouse settings and has the potential to be efficient and, at least in theory, cost effective.
Labels: bookish, random bits, rantishness